One Hundred Dollars at The Great Hall
I don’t have a whole to say about these videos. I’ve shot a Hundred Bucks so many times over the years, but these are probably the best of the bunch. It was a fantastic night, and even though there were some hiccups, like my audio being pretty crummy, it was a learning experience, as always. Many thanks to my new friend Adrian Vieni who has just moved to the city. I’ve long been a fan of his Wood & Wires video series, so it was awesome getting to shoot alongside him. We’re all in this together so hopefully we can do it more often!

I interviewed One Hundred Dollars’ lead singer and songwriter Simone Schmidt a few days after the show to discuss their new album Songs of Man, amongst other things.
I saw you a few times in the days leading up to your big show at The Great Hall, and you were obviously very busy trying to get ready, but I’ve noticed that you always seem to have a lot on your plate no matter what. Do you like to stay busy? I don’t get the sense that you’re the type of person who spends 3 hours in front of the TV every day.
Oh, I just watch The Good Wife. It’s a TV show on Global Television starring, uh, Marianna… I forget her name. I like that TV show, but I don’t watch that much TV. I guess that wasn’t your question. I’m quite busy a lot of the time because I like making things. Being a band with a lot of people also means you have to make sure everyone’s interests are being taken into concern while you’re making them. That multiplies work by a lot.
Do you try to split the work between every band member when preparing for a show like that?
Yeah. Ian and I were talking about how we felt satisfied getting ready for that show because it was really a good group effort. We pulled it off on our own with the help of a few friends.
It definitely seemed like the biggest crowd you’ve played for in Toronto.
Well, we’ve filled the Horseshoe, which is the same capacity. But we wanted to make this a special occasion, and we were able to have full control over the venue, except the beer prices, as we rented it. It was nice to have control over the theatrics. We had Michael Comeau and Ilse Kramer working the spotlight and the board for us, which lent a lot to the spectacle.
You can never underestimate the importance of lighting. Having just one colour light that never changes…
… and they never turn off all the way! When you’re touring and you wind up at a pub and no one is working the ambience you think back to the shows with the good lights wistfully. But no matter what, there are still always a billion variables you can’t control.

I could tell that you really pushed yourselves to make the concert memorable, from the order of the songs to using the space in a unique way, like performing in the balcony at one point.
Yeah, you want people to take your work home, have it linger in some way. It’s really a good time to perform that long too, because often if you’re on another bill or playing a festival you only get 45 minutes. You don’t get to set your tone and then move people with it for a sustained amount of time. It’s good to have more time for the journey.
Even you seemed a little taken back when you got called out for a second encore and you weren’t sure what you were going to play. Luckily you had some cover tunes up your sleeve.
Haha, yeah! I like the way Paul plays on “Mental Revenge” (ed: Waylon Jennings song they covered, written by Mel Tillis). It’s fun to be playing our new songs too. It’s been a few years playing the Forest of Tears / Hold It Together / 7″ catalog, so it’s going to be real transformative to tour Songs of Man. They’re songs that allow for a totally different range of a emotions — it’s healthier for me to be getting to other places, rather than the familiar territory of the last record, which was mostly about rape and death and rejection.
Yeah, almost like the new songs can bring something out of the older songs just by playing them one after another.
Totally. I felt I was smiling a lot more, quite naturally through the songs. A few smiles make a real difference if you’re going to play a lot of nights in a row.
Going back to the show, you’ve started playing guitar in One Hundred Dollars, which is something you never did before because you only learned over the last year. Why did you decide to learn guitar now?
I should have earlier. I used to write songs in the air, or mandolin, or on the piano. But I haven’t lived anywhere permanent for a long time, so I don’t have regular access to a piano. I wanted to be able to catch songs as they came to me. I felt I was losing a lot of them. I wanted the independence to accompany myself, and express myself instrumentally. I love collaborating with Ian and Paul and David and Stu and Kyle, and it’s a beautiful relationship, but it doesn’t satisfy every creative urge that I have.
But really the way it happened was the way a lot of the best things happen to me — I didn’t plan for it. I had been asked by a guy called Chris Coole, who’s a legend of a banjo player and a great guitar player, to come sing with him and then when I went and didn’t know how to play guitar he was quite surprised and he told me what I knew, which was that I should learn how to play guitar since I was writing songs in the country tradition. So he gave me free lessons for a long time and now we actually have a duet called Coole & Downes. It’s a different kind of music and I feel really really secularly blessed for being able to meet him and be taught by him because not everyone gets taught by the best.

You did a songwriting residency in Sackville not too long ago. What sort of songs were you writing there, and did any of those songs make it onto the new record or was it all pretty much done by that point?
Nah. We finished the record in November and I went in January / February. I’ve been writing some other kinds of songs, more traditional songs for a while, because I’m really moved by bluegrass and old time but often the misogyny overwhelms the beauty of that music — all these murder ballads, men killing women, women acting badly according to men, all these one sided narratives. It’s right to remember that those songs were written, and wondrous that they’ve been preserved — but I always wonder what songs and stories were lost. And because I love playing that music, I want to talk back to it, like I would to anyone I love. So the idea is to interject sometimes, to write back into history a lot of the stories that it seems to me must have been lost, mostly about women of that time. In Sackville I was just working on songs in that vein. I also scored and recorded an installation piece called “Song of a Plinth,” which I showed in the Struts Gallery where I was staying. Basically a plinth having a crisis in the face of a gallery-goer. A little joke.
Now that One Hundred Dollars has been a band for a few more years, have you started to collaborate more on writing the songs?
Well, me and Ian used to write most of the songs together, but on this one I wrote two on my own. Paul wrote a few with me, and Ian wrote the rest with me. So that was rad to have different influences. You could tell — we all have different musical styles and tendencies. Ian picks in a particular way, Morty’s got some more riff based songs…
Do they contribute to the lyrics?
Sometimes. Someone will give me a hook and I write around it. One day we were talking about Parkdale, and the changes — how they tore up the benches so that people can’t sleep on them, and Ian said, “Everybody wins except for the losers,” and I said, “Let’s write that song.” Sometimes if I’m feeling doubtful I’ll say ‚“Paul, what do you think of this?” and he’ll push me in a direction. All songs come differently. Often I spend months on a song, getting it right, re-writing it, belaboring the process and then I bring them to the band. Sometimes I draw so much from the external that, even though I write the words, it feels like I’m co-writing with the rest of the world.
Being the only woman in One Hundred Dollars, did you have to consult the rest of the group about certain subjects on the new album, which is all about/from the perspective of men?
I’m pretty sure that they informed a lot of why I wanted to write the record, but never in direct consultation. It’s a man’s world, you know? I have no choice but to think about men, and how they effect me and everything. In retrospect, through touring, I was just hanging out with only men in very close quarters in ways that I hadn’t done before, so this record was a part of working with that, and working through it. Prior to that, I felt like more of a man than a women. But in hanging out with only men day in day out I came to feel alien to their ways of behaving and communicating. The experience shed some light on the differences that exist between many men and women, with which I’d never had to contend before. Because I’m totally not a biological determinist, that’s important to put in there — I don’t think that gender has necessarily to do with your sexe — and I feel that gender’s pretty performative. I couldn’t tell you one way or another that males are this way or females are that way. Actually, I can’t tell you everything I think right now… it would take too long. Anyway, I’m inspired by my life, so naturally the characters I was orbiting were mostly performing… man, you know? Which means a lot of things. Sometimes it even means nothing.
So did you write towards that goal of having a collection of songs from the perspective of different men, or did you notice afterwards that there was that common thread?
I had written “Aaron’s Song” and “Black Gold.” I thought it would be a funny record name, Songs of Man — “mankind.” I ran with it, I journaled as these characters, tried to develop and feel who they were. A lot of the characters are antagonists, or are hard people to love. Some of the songs were efforts at forgiveness. The guy in “Fires of Regret” is a total jerk, but I felt it would be important for me to try to understand him, and I did, and in some ways I came to see similarities between the ways that he’s a deadbeat and the way that I’ve abandoned people and things. And similarly, in “Powdered Confessions,” that guy is not a cool dude at all, but he doesn’t reveal a lot about himself in the song directly, so you don’t know that on first meeting him. He’s raveled in his mixed metaphors and the notion is that the more you listen the more you might hear about him. I also was thinking, when I wrote this, about how men song writers write women performers’ songs. That gem “If You Seek Amy” was written by Max Martin for Britney Spears too sing.
I know you’re writing from the perspective of all these characters, but sometimes I feel like, take “Brother” for example, it could be interpreted as being autobiographical, no?
That’s funny, you’re the first person whose asked me about that one. Maybe that’s one of the ones where the gender is totally irrelevant. But I was in his mind when I wrote that one. He’s got a good case of forbidden love, because he’s in a closeted relationship with another closeted man. He’s got a lot of shame surrounding it. He can’t deal with himself, but he’s trying to find peace. So, is that autobiographical? No, but in a way I’m like, who hasn’t had a case of forbidden love or an inability to deal with themselves? In what ways are we all closeted?
I totally interpreted the lyrics as something else. I thought it was more general, like, trying to remain friends with someone after your relationship has gone down the toilet.
Yeah, I’m glad — it should be a broadly understood song. Maybe other people in different predicaments come to understand themselves through that character, see themselves in him. It’s a variation on the classic cheating song.
When I told you that I’d gotten a promo copy of the record and been listening to it, you got a little upset mad because I didn’t receive the lyrics. You want people to experience your music and the lyrics all together?
Yeah, I mean I would like them to have the option. That’s what I feel is the weirdest part of the digital distribution of music too… uhh, so I’m going to upload all the lyrics to our website because I remember when I was young I would get an R.E.M. tape, and Michael Stipe wedged a lot of things into his songs that I didn’t understand after repeat listen after repeat listen after repeat listen, and I could listen to that music without knowing what he said and sing my own words to it. I used to think the hook of the song “The Sidewinder Sleeps Tonight” went “phoning jamaica, phoning jamaica” but he’s saying “phone me when you try to wake her up,” which I figured out from reading the lyrics. When I read the lyrics, I came to appreciate his writing on a literary level which is a way I would like people to have the option to experience our music. Obviously you write a song knowing that people are just going to hear it in passing, it’s cool, but I just like people to have the option of pouring over the words. Everybody consumes music differently, right?
Luckily you’re a fairly easy singer to understand.
Sometimes, I do admit, writing the lyrics out for people to read is hard because you end up negating double entendres. Like if you used a homonym you don’t know which word to choose when spelling the song, but you gotta choose one because you don’t want to start writing everything like Prince did, you know?
How did Prince write?
Phonetically sometimes, or see with a C, instead of s-e-e, haha.

The whole country music genre these days… like, you seem to have really been embraced by the punk and “indie” scene in Toronto, but have you made inroads, or would you eventually like to break into playing with more mainstream country bands?
Yeah, country fans like us for sure, mostly outside of Toronto. There’s a lot of good country music that’s not getting mainstream play. I mean, how do you feel about most popular music? It’s not the best music or the most thoughtful music that’s getting the most play. I wish it was– it would be great for culture in general… for people to be exposed to thoughtful and nuanced music. Because music contributes to forming culture, and culture forms the way we behave. And you know I don’ t know that the acts on CMT are really tapping into the truest pains of our time, or using country music to do what it’s done best, which is to talk about the difficult. It’s mostly about drinking– I mean a drinking song used to also be about why one drinks. But right now it just seems like drinking songs are beer anthems.
Well, the music you’re playing feels more like country music in the traditional sense. Whenever I turn on CMT these days, you’re right, it feels like a beer commercial.
Yeah, and I just don’t know if that’s representative of what most country musicians are really doing anyway.
The last thing I wanted to ask you about are the tie-dye band shirts you made for the show. At the end of the night you seemed really surprised that none had really sold. I mean, I’ve been wearing mine…
Really? Good. We worked hard on them. You try to push fashion in certain directions, you never know if it’s going to catch.
Well, I mean especially your album designs, which I know you work on, has elements country records sleeves from in the 60s, but you seem to have taken a different approach with the band merch. Your t-shirts look like something you’d wear to the beach or something.
Dave Clarke made the cover to our new record. I feel like people went the beach in the 60s.
No no, more like 80s, with graffiti style and bright colours and stuff.
It’s an interesting period in pop culture - have you noticed everyone’s just going wacko with retro stuff? We’re at this point where you can choose the best out every different era. There’s so much throw back country. It’s not my bag. I mean, that’s not to say we don’t draw from the tradition, from the past — there’s a lot of 80s influence even on the record, because I like that era of country music for sure. Yeah, I like Rosanne Cash, and the Judds, all that stuff, but hey, I don’t know if you can tell…. (the end)
Songs of Man is available on CD/LP through Outside Music.